Steffi Sesuraj Info

“You can fix a bug in a week,” she told the board, her voice calm but absolute. “You take a decade to rebuild a broken trust.”

She handed out cards with different user identities: “Anoushka, 16, shares art online.” “Mr. Davies, 72, uses your app to video-call his doctor.” “Lea, a journalist in a country with strict speech laws.”

It was a radical shift. Suddenly, privacy wasn’t a legal shackle. It was a design challenge. The team started building “privacy by default” settings, simplified data download tools, and clear, cartoonish icons that told users exactly what data an app was using, in real time. Steffi Sesuraj

Her big break came when a social media startup, reeling from a public breach of user location data, hired her as their first Data Protection Officer. The engineering team saw her as a “no” person—a roadblock. The CEO saw her as a necessary evil.

Her journey began not in a computer science lecture hall, but in a cramped, brightly lit legal library at a state university. Growing up as the daughter of two librarians, Steffi had learned early that information was powerful, but misused information was dangerous. She watched her mother navigate the early days of the internet, carefully teaching patrons which websites to trust and which to avoid. That childhood lesson became her life’s mission. “You can fix a bug in a week,”

“For every feature you want to build,” Steffi explained, “I want you to ask: ‘Would I feel good if this person knew exactly how their data was used?’ If the answer makes you hesitate, we redesign.”

After law school, while her peers flocked to corporate mergers and intellectual property battles, Steffi dove headfirst into the then-niche world of data privacy. She pored over the dense, 88-page text of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) like it was a thriller novel. While others saw compliance checklists, she saw a framework for dignity. Suddenly, privacy wasn’t a legal shackle

Her most famous case, however, came when a major smart-home device company discovered a vulnerability that had been silently recording snippets of private conversations. The company’s legal team wanted to bury the report, issue a quiet patch, and hope no one noticed.